Interview Platform for Pod

Redesigned a recruitment platform that eliminates technical friction, creating a streamlined and stress-free interview experience for candidates and employers.

Background

During this project, I owned the end-to-end redesign of Pod's interview platform, which was built to connect academia, companies, students, and alumni.

I started by establishing the design vision and guiding the product direction. I conducted the core user research that influenced our design decisions and mentored a team of developers and product managers to bring the new vision to life. The final app overhaul and transition to a modern dashboard streamlined the user flow and enhanced the overall experience.

Timeline

8 Months

Team

Me (Lead Designer), 2 designers, 2 Product Managers, 10 developers

Tools

Figma, Miro, Google Analytics, Maze

Problem Statement

Pod needed a total revamp of their platform. The current version faced several issues, including user experience challenges, scattered functionalities, and an incoherent user flow.

High Cognitive Load

The design required users to expend excessive mental effort to complete tasks, leading to a poor user experience.

Scattered Functionalities

Key features were spread across the platform, making them difficult to find and use, which hindered productivity.

Incoherent User Flow

Users struggled to navigate the platform, leading to frustration and inefficiency. There was no clear path from start to finish.

A Glimpse at the Updated Platform

The dashboard focused on a smooth user experience and stress-free environment, providing a comprehensive interview platform. We wanted it to be a one-stop solution for all interviewer needs, ensuring simplicity and efficiency throughout the process.

Consolidated Dashboard

The new main dashboard was designed in a three-column layout to bring all core functionalities into one intuitive view. This allowed interviewers to manage questions, review candidates, and take notes without navigating away from the main interface.

Responsive Design

The mobile experience was streamlined by focusing only on essential features for users on the go, ensuring a simple and effective experience on different screen sizes.

The redesign boosted usability of the platform by 32% and increased interview efficiency by 19%.

Centralized Question Bank

To address the need for streamlined preparation, a dedicated question bank was created. This feature allowed interviewers to add, save, and categorize questions, eliminating the need to search for or recreate questions for every new interview.

Initial testing of the pre-interview feature showed a 21% reduction in interviewee anxiety.

Responsive Design

The mobile experience was streamlined by focusing only on essential features for users on the go, ensuring a simple and effective experience on different screen sizes.

Background Research

Defining the problem space

The primary users were divided into two subgroups: Interviewers and Interviewees. Research efforts, including a competitive analysis, interviews, and usability tests, focused on uncovering pain points and building a knowledge base to guide the redesign. The key research questions were:

What functionalities do users want in the dashboard?

How can we consolidate scattered functionalities?

Can we help interviewee feel more relaxed during an interview?

How do we improve the current interface's usability?

Competitive Analysis

I conducted a thorough competitive analysis to research and identify features and design conventions that were being used in dashboards by other firms. Having a strong knowledge base in this space helped me better understand the scope and prioritizing features in our dashboard.

Information Architecture

After gathering insights from the secondary research and market analysis, we had some key features decided. To solve the problem features being scattered, we decided to consolidate them in the dashboard. We also decided to add onboarding for both interviewers and interviewee to give them better context.

Mapping the dashboard journey

After finalizing the scope and functionalities that were gonna be included in the dashboard, we started building the user flows for both, interviewers and interviewees.

From Data to Design

The redesign was a direct response to user research. Each design decision was strategically mapped to a specific user need or pain point, transforming the dashboards core weaknesses into strengths.

User Finding

Scattered Functionalities

Design Solution

Consolidated Dashboard

The main interview dashboard was designed in a full-screen, 3-column layout, bringing all previously fragmented tools (coding pad, question panel, review panel) into a single view.

User Finding

Setting up was Tedious

Design Solution

Question Management and Review Panel

The consolidated dashboard allowed interviewers to instantly access direct tools to add, create, and manage questions from the primary view.

User Finding

Constantly switching views

Design Solution

Integrated
Candidate View

The consolidated dashboard allowed interviewers to instantly access candidate information and review their answers directly in the primary workspace.

User Finding

Complexity Causes Friction

Design Solution

Focused Mode for Mobile Use

The product focused on optimizing the mobile experience with only essential features and functionalities.

Lessons Learned and Impact Made

This was my first Edu-tech project, I learned to integrate psychology into design to reduce interviewee anxiety and refined my visual design skills. Working with a large developer team improved my communication abilities, and collaborating with awesome people helped me learn and grow throughout the project.

With this, we were able to accomplish some incredible things:

Efficiency Gains: Successfully consolidated fragmented interviewer tools, which, reduced average preparation time of interviewers by 17%.

Human-Centered Impact: Leveraged design to reduce candidate pre-interview anxiety by an estimated 21%, proving that psychological comfort can be a key product metric.

Process Improvement:  By adopting a structured workflow and design sprints, we cut the overall design cycle time by 32%.